Sunday, 17 January 2016

Borneonisation process and policy - III


Malaysia. Report of the Inter-Governmental Committee, 1962. 
Annex B. The Public Service. The Interim Period.

6. In relation to the State Service there will be provision in the State Constitution on the lines of Article 153 of the Federal Constitution to empower the State Government to prescribe, from time to time, the extent to which preference will be given to Natives. The term "Native" will be defined in the Constitution by adopting - 

(i) in Sarawak the definition in the Sarawak Interpretation Ordinance; and
(ii) in North Borneo the definition that will appear in the State Constitution.

Similarly, the State Governments will prescribe in respect of the State Services their own schemes of service and decide how far external recruitment is needed. If such recruitment is needed the State may either make its own arrangements through the Department of Technical Co-operation or from any other sources acceptable to the Federal Government or ask for the help of the Federal Government.



Laws of Sarawak. Chapter 61. Interpretation Ordinance, 2005. Part I. Application and General provisions of Interpretation. Interpretation of certain words and expressions. 

3 (1). The following words and expressions shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them:

“native” means a citizen of Malaysia of any race which is now considered to be indigenous to Sarawak as set out in the Schedule;

SCHEDULE (Section 3)

Races which are now considered to be indigenous to Sarawak and accordingly natives within the meaning of this Ordinance.

Bidayuhs or Land Dayaks
Bukitans
Bisayahs
Dusuns
Ibans or Sea Dayaks
Kadayans
Kelabits
Kayans
Kenyahs (including Sabups and Sipengs)
Kajangs (including Sekapans, Kejamans, Lahanans, Punans, Tanjongs and Kanowits)
Lugats
Lisums
Malays
Melanaus
Muruts or Lun Bawangs
Penans
Sians
Tagals
Tabuns
Ukits

And any admixture of these races with each other.


Laws of Malaysia. Federal Constitution. Part XII. General and Miscellaneous. 
Reservation of quotas in respect of services, permits, etc., 
for Malays and natives of any of the States of Sabah and Sarawak.

153. (1) It shall be the responsibility of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to safeguard the special position of the Malays and natives of any of the States of Sabah and Sarawak and the legitimate interests of other communities in accordance with the provisions of this Article. 

(2) Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, but subject to the provisions of Article 40 and of this Article, the Yang diPertuan Agong shall exercise his functions under this Constitutions and federal law in such manner as may be necessary to safeguard the special position of the Malays and natives of any of the States of Sabah and Sarawak and to ensure the reservation for Malays and natives of any of the States of Sabah and Sarawak of such proportion as he may deem reasonable of positions in the public service (other than the public service of a State) and of scholarships, exhibitions and other similar educational or training privileges or special facilities given or accorded by the Federal Government and, when any permit or license for the operation of any trade or business is required by federal law, then, subject to the provisions of that law and this Article, of such permits and licenses.

(4) In exercising his functions under this Constitution and federal law in accordance with Clauses (1) to (3) the Yang di-Pertuan Agong shall not deprive any person of any public office held by him or of the continuance of any scholarship, exhibition or other educational or training privileges or special facilities enjoyed by him.

Author: Zulfaqar Sa'adi in Ao Nang, Thailand.

Annex B, paragraph 6 of the IGC Report (referred above) clearly state that there must be a provision in the Federal Constitution to empower the Sarawak State Government to prescribe, from time to time, the extent to which preference will be given to Natives in relation to the Sarawak State services. It was the responsibility of the elected Malaysia Parliamentarians from Malaya, Sarawak and Sabah to devise and construct a provision in the Federal Constitution for this purpose. Did our MP in Sarawak do their part to ensure the provision or provisions was given in the constitution for the borneonisation process?

Judge for yourself. 

Before we go further, let get an insight of understanding of the responsibility of each States (Malaya, Sarawak and Sabah) in Malaysia.

In respect of Sarawak, The Federation of Malaysia was formed on 16th September 1963 through integration of the then independent State of the Federation of Malaya with the Non-Self-Governing Territory of Sarawak. Through such integration based on UN Resolution 1541 (Principle VI), Sarawak can be said to have reached a full measure of self-government. 

Let it be clear that, this is the achievement of Sarawak on the day the integration happen on 16th September 1963 through the formation of "Malaysia". Sarawak achieve "a full measure of Self-government" status. This is the "change of status" that was mentioned in the UN website. 

On 22nd July 1963, Sarawak achieve "self-government" status and on 16th September 1963, Sarawak was further achieve a "full measure of self-government" through the formation of Malaysia as per UN Resolution 1541 (Principle VI). It must be continue here, that the real purpose of the formation of "Malaysia" is for the decolonization process of Sarawak which is "self-determination" and eventually the independent of the State of Sarawak. 

As for today, in 2016, Sarawak was in a "state of decolonization process" through UN Resolution 1541. An International Trusteeship System was being adopted here. This means, on 16th Septembr 1963, British as the initial Trustee of Sarawak transferred the Trusteeship obligation to the Federation of Malaya, and Malaya became a new Trustee of Sarawak. Sarawak then became Trust Territory of the Federation of Malaya through the formation of the Federation of Malaysia.

As a Trustee, let us get back to the borneonisation process as per Annex B paragraph 6, it was the responsibility of the Trustee, the Federation of Malaya to guide and to empower the Sarawak State government through the Federal Constitution in term of the borneonisation process of the Sarawak public services. 

It was clearly mentioned that through the Federal Constitution which must be in concomitant of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 and IGC Report, the Federation of Malaya as the Trustee must guide to empower the Trust Territory of Sarawak State government to eventually and successfully, from time to time, a full implementation of the borneonisation process in Sarawak. A full borneonisation process where preference will be given to the Natives for the Sarawak public services.

Today, some people was accusing the federal government and whatnot to be responsible for the failure of the borneonisation process after 52 years of the formation of Malaysia. At some part, as a Trustee, the Federation of Malaya is responsible for this policy. 

However, it was Sarawak State Governments that was and is the entity that was the first culprit that was responsible for the borneonisation process. As Sarawak State Government is the one that must act to prescribe in respect of the Sarawak Public Services their own schemes of service required for the borneonisation process. This is based on the Annex B. paragraph 6 of the IGC Report. 

Did the schemes of service was fully borneonised and filled by the Native today? It was up for our Assemblymen to be answerable for this question and the people of Sarawak to demand for full implementation of their rights of borneonisation process.     
  
It was also the responsibility of the Sarawak State Government to decide how far external recruitment is needed for the Sarawak public services. If the posts which was widely available and can be easily filled by the people of Sarawak but instead was filled by the Malayans, it was the responsibility of the Sarawak State Government in the first place. They are the one that has the power to make this decision. If the Sarawak State Government is clueless of their own legislative power, it's up to the people to vote for them or not in the next Sarawak elections.  

For external recruitment, Sarawak State Government is the one that was responsible to make their own arrangement or from any sources acceptable to the Federal Government (which i must mentioned here again, must be in concomitant of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 and IGC Report) or ask for the help of the Federal Government as it was the sacred trust of the Trustee to guide and help the Trust Territory on the matter of public services as it was the major objective of the policy of borneonisation agreed for the formation of "Malaysia". 

Thus, here we can make a conclusion that foremost, it was the responsibility of the Sarawak State Government to accelerate the borneonisation process in every aspect of Sarawak services, meanwhile the Federation of Malaya as a Trustee, must guide and help the Trust Territory accordingly with agree termed in the Malaysia Agreement 1963 and IGC Report. 

Any less than this, is a failure of "Malaysia". 

*New information will be continue to be added in this article at a regular basis as per requirement.
Author: Zulfaqar bin Sa'adi. Information Chief of State Reform Party (STAR).

Thursday, 14 January 2016

Borneonisation process and policy - II



Malaysia. Report of the Inter-Governmental Committee, 1962. 
Annex B. The Public Service. The Interim Period.

5. Borneonisation of the Public Services in the Borneo States is a major objective of the policy. For a number of years to come special arrangements will be necessary to secure this objective and to protect the legitimate interests of the Native peoples. There are two problems: the preference to be given to Native over other candidates for State and Federalised posts and the laying-down of suitable schemes of service.

Borneonisation is a very important issue that it was made as a major objective of the policy regarding the public services in the federal and state government. The Borneonisation process must take place in Sarawak where the state department services must be fill by the people of Sarawak and any department in Sarawak that was turn, made or create to be under the jurisdiction of the federal government (federalised department) must also be fill by the people of Sarawak. 

Any other federal government in the federation also must be made available for the people of Sarawak to be fill in as there must also be a qualified officers of Sarawak sent to the other part of Malaysia (Malaya or Sabah) as per agreed under the public service term of agreement. (This topic will be discussed further in other article). 

Special arrangement must be made by the current Sarawak state government as well as by the federal government for the borneonisation process to take place as soon as possible covering the Sarawak state government department and the federalised department. This is the responsibility of the current government to come up with certain special arrangement in pursuant of this important policy. The special arrangement can come in term of the new policy, task force, scheme and so forth to be devised properly by the Sarawak government and federal government respectively or jointly to achieve this objective.

Sarawak belongs to the people of Sarawak and the heritage of the people of Sarawak. There is no denying this rights. Sarawak is a country which belong to the independent people of Sarawak.

That is why, the Borneonisation process is made as a major policy regarding the public service to protect the legitimate interests of the Native peoples of Sarawak.This is the legitimate interests of the people of Sarawak which is to govern our own country and to develop our own self-governmental system by our own people in-line with the UN Resolution 1541 as per the formation of the Federation of Malaysia. A process to achieve advanced self-government and eventually self-determination of the state.

To achieve the objective of Borneonisation,  preference to be given to Native over other candidates for State and Federalised posts and the laying-down of suitable schemes of service.  

This mean, any posts available in the Sarawak state department and any federalised department in the state must be preferably given to the people of Sarawak. At the same time, suitable schemes of service must be pursue and construct by the power-that-be of the Sarawak government and federal government to achieve this important policy.

The question that the people need to ask is, how many of the related posts since the formation of the Federation of Malaysia in the state has been given to the people of Sarawak either it was state department services, federalised department service or federal service?

What are the suitable schemes that has been construct and pursue by the Sarawak government and federal government to achieve this policy since 1963 until today?

If there is any, how successful is the scheme of borneonistion has been made since then?

This is a very pertinent question that need to be forwarded into the Sarawak Council Negri and the parliament house as the pursuant of this policy must be achieve as soon as possible for a proper functioning of the Sarawak state government and federal government respectively.

Borneonisation is the rights of the people of Sarawak. It was signed and agreed by all partners as per the formation of the Federation of Malaysia. 

Borneonisation is so important that this policy will determine the sovereignty of the state of Sarawak. 

In the end, it was always our elected representatives, Sarawak government and the federal govenment of the day which will be accountable for the pursuant or even a breach of the term agreed as per the formation of Malaysia and this policy.

Remember, Borneonisation of the Public Services in the Borneo States is a major objective of the policy.


*New information will be continue to be added in this article at a regular basis as per requirement.
Author: Zulfaqar bin Sa'adi. Information Chief of State Reform Party (STAR).

Borneonisation process and policy - I



Malaysia. Report of the Inter-Governmental Committee, 1962. 
Annex B. The Public Service.

1. The arrangement for the Public Service have three main purposes: to provide for the proper functioning of the Federalised and State Departments in the Borneo States when Malaysia comes into being while preserving the existing terms of service of serving officers, to provide for the progressive Borneonisation of the State Departments and over an interim period of the Federalised Departments, and subject to these interim arrangements to provide for the full integration of the Federalised Departments with the Federal Public Service as a whole. The means recommended for achieving these purposes are set out below.

As per the formation of the Federation of Malaysia on 16th September 1963, the Report of the Inter-Governmental Committee (IGC) is one of the legal documents that was signed and agreed by all the partners of the federation namely Malaya, Singapore, Sarawak, Sabah and co-signatories British.

IGC was an agreement made between governments which made it above and beyond the reach of the federal constitution. This is strengthen further by the federal constitution itself in Article 169 regarding international agreement. This mean, any arrangement and amendments in the federal constitution must be made in-line with the IGC and in this article, must provide for the progressive Borneonisation of the State Departments and over an interim period of the Federalised Departments...

Here, it was mentioned that Borneonisation must be made progressively to the Sarawak and Sabah State Departments as well as to the federalised departments. A lot of people in Malaysia especially Sarawakian and Sabahan already know that their states respectively must be borneonized but we also must know that our rights of borneonisation also covered the federal department!

Borneonisation is a policy and agreed term that must be abide by the Sarawak state government and this process must be made progressively, which means, borneonisation process must be made and achieve as soon as possible, to ensure all the public services in the state to be handed to the people of Sarawak.

Further, Borneonisation is not a concept that only enveloped the state government services, but also must be made progressively to the federal government departments as well. 

This process means that the federal government services also must be made available for the people of Sarawak. This is only fair as the federal government today should be filled by all the signatories partner from Malaya, Sarawak and Sabah respectively. The fairest, there should be 1/3 federal government services fill by each of the component states.

This is the agreement for the formation of the Federation of Malaysia. Any less than that is a breached of the international agreement and may lead to the improper functioning of the Federalised and State Departments in the Borneo States. Any less than that is a failure of "Malaysia".

52 years already in the formation of "Malaysia", did our state and federal government of the day, has made any progress of this policy?

Judge for yourself.


*New information will be continue to be added in this article at a regular basis as per requirement.
Author: Zulfaqar bin Sa'adi. Information Chief of State Reform Party (STAR).



Friday, 8 January 2016

‘Twin Covenants’ of the United Nations


The UN adopted a series of treaties in 1966 called the ‘Twin Covenants’ and called on the member states to sign it. The most important clauses of these covenants were as follows:

1. All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.

2. All peoples may, for their own ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources ... In no case may a people be deprived of its own means of subsistence.

3. The States Parties to the present Covenant…, shall promote the realisation of the right of self-determination, and shall respect that right, in conformity with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations.


The "twin Covenants" are:


Sarawak and Sabah nationalists, make sure you engraved this covenants inside your mind.


*New information will be continue to be added in this article at a regular basis as per requirement.
Author: Zulfaqar bin Sa'adi. Information Chief of State Reform Party (STAR).

Tuesday, 5 January 2016

MSCC Memorandum - A "Malaya" concept of Malaysia


The Malaysia Solidarity Consultative Committee (MSCC) present their memorandum to the Cobbold Commission and below is a FULL lists of the memorandum presented at that time.

MSCC Memorandum is only a memorandum. This is not an agreement on the formation of Malaysia. Please keep that in mind!

MSCC served as a marketing opportunities for Malaya to presented and engraved their concept of Malaysia to the leaders and the people of the Borneo Territories.

Below is a FULL lists of such memorandum. Judge for yourself. On the next article, we will explore the back-story, secret documents and analysis of the in-depth events that transpired at that time.

Bookmarks this for further reading and keep sharing.


THE MEMORANDUM - IN FULL

Introduction:

The statement made on May 27, 1961, by the Prime Minister of the Federation of Malaya, Y.T.M. Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra Al-Haj, on the concept of Malaysia at a press luncheon in Singapore sparked off a lively interest in Malaya, Singapore and the Borneo Territories in the idea of Malaysia resulting in all manner of speculations on what the plan and form Malaysia might take.

While views welcoming the proposal were expressed in the territories concerned, the idea of Malaysia became the target of serious criticisms from certain quarters.

In view of the indeterminate way in which the subjects, of necessity, had been launched, there was uncertainty in the minds of many of the people, particularly in the Borneo Territories. However, one point was clear; few could claim to be apathetic to this vital subject.

2 - Formation of Malaysia Solidarity Consultative Committee:

Malaysia was first jointly dismissed by the leaders of the Borneo Territories, Singapore and the Federation of Malaya at the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association regional meeting which was held in Singapore in July, 1961.

During the Conference, misgivings regarding local interests were expressed and views exchanged. As a result of a preliminary examination, delegations from North Borneo and Sarawak took the initiative to propose the formation of a Malaysia Solidarity Consultative Committee of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association.

Their joint statement said inter alia "we have decided to form a Malaysia Solidarity Consultative Committee consisting of representatives from each of the five territories.

The object of the Consultative Committee would be to continue the explanations and discussions initiated at the Commonwealth Parliamentary Associations and ensure that the impetus given to Malaysia is not slowed down ....

"What emerged-clearly from the conference (CPA) was that the delegates who shape and mould public opinion in their respective territories, were convinced both of the necessity and inevitability of Malaysia."

3 - Aims and objects ol MSCC:

The aims and objects of the Committee as formulated and agreed upon at its first meeting in Jesselton on August 24, 1961 are:-

a)    To collect and collate views and opinions concerning the creation of Malaysia consisting of Brunei, North Borneo (Sabah), Sarawak, Singapore and the Federation of Malaya.
b)     To disseminate information on the question of Malaysia.
c)     To initiate and encourage discussions on Malaysia; and
d)     To foster activities that would promote and expedite the realisation of Malaysia.

4 - Committee meetings:

The Committee met four times, namely, in Jesselton on August 21, 1961; in Kuching on December 18-19-20, 1961; in Kuala Lumpur on January 6-7-8, 1962; and in Singapore on February 1-2-3, 1962.

5 - Brunei's attendance:

Brunei did not participate at the Jesselton meeting but attended as observers during the Kuching, Kuala Lumpur and Singapore meetings.

6 - Concept of Malaysia supported:

At these meetings delegations submitted reports on the progress made by them in their respective territories with regard to explaining and furthering the concept of Malaysia among the people.

The Committee, while reiterating its acceptance of and support for the concept of Malaysia, recognised the need for the widest dissemination of all information relating to Malaysia among the peoples of the territories so that all would appreciate the vital necessity of the realisation of Malaysia as soon as possible.

7 - Not unitary:

In view of the fact that all delegations acknowledge the desirability that all component states should retain their identity and autonomy, the possibility of Malaysia being formed as a unitary state was never considered.

8 - Federation defined:

The Committee envisaged an association of several sovereign states with a central organ invested with powers directly over the citizens of the member state and in certain defined circumstances over the member states themselves.

There would be a central government and also state governments, but from the view point of international law, the collection of states forming the federation would be recognised as one sovereign state within the family of nations.

9 - Strong central government vital:

The Committee in the course of its deliberations has come to the conclusion that External Affairs, Defence and Security of Malaysia should be vested in the central government and it also supports the objective of an effective central government as vital to sustain Malaysia.

Accordingly, the Committee arrives at the only logical answer that Malaysia should be in the form of a Federation. And, in view of the special problems relating to Singapore, the Committee appreciates the need for special arrangements for Singapore.

It was agreed that, like Singapore, the three Borneo territories should have certain local safeguards - in the case of the Borneo Territories, in respect of such subjects, for example, control of migration, Borneanisation and special provisions for taxation, customs and other fiscal matters to ensure that the less developed economy of the Borneo Territories are not suddenly upset by the application of a unified Malaysian customs and excise duty and other national taxation but should only be made uniform gradually as the development of the economy of these territories progresses - but could otherwise be placed on equal footing with the other States of the present Federation of Malaya.

10 - Wishes of people respected:

The Committee, of course, is of the opinion that whatever safeguards which might be provided for the Borneo Territories must confirm with the expressed wish of the Borneo people themselves but that such arrangements should not prejudice the principle of a strong central government or curtail the fundamental liberties of the nationals of the Federation of Malaysia.

11- Singapore Plan:

The Committee notes with satisfaction the heads of agreement negotiated between the Governments of the Federation of Malaya and Singapore for the merging of the State in the Federation of Malaysia.

The Committee recognises the fact that Brunei is a self-governing state and not a colony as in the case of Sarawak and North Borneo, that the Commission of Enquiry's jurisdictiom does not extend to Brunei and that the State is competent to negotiate direct with the governments of the United Kingdom and the Federation of Malaya.

12 - Sovereignty:

There is no doubt in the mind of the Committee that, from the international point of view, sovereignty rests with the Federation of Malaysia.

The Committee accepts the principle that the Federation of Malaysia should have a constitutional head of state and there is no reason to discontinue the system of the appointment of Yang di-Pertuan Agong. The sovereignty of the Ruler of each state of the Federation of Malaysia will be guaranteed.

Within the concept of Malaysia the Sultan of Brunei will be eligible for nomination to be Supreme Head of the Federation while Sarawak and North Borneo will each have a Head of State. Each State will have a Constitution of its own and its powers defined.

13 - Islam as the Religion of the Federation and Religious Freedom:

The Committee directed a great deal of its attention to the question of Islam as the religion of the Federation.

It is satisfied that the acceptance of Islam as the religion of the Federation would not endanger religious freedom within Malaysia nor will it make Malaysia a State less secular.

The present constitution of the Federation of Malaya, which would serve as the basis of the new federation, has adequately guaranteed that other religions can be practised in peace and harmony in any part of the Federation.

Every person will have the right to profess and practise his religion. No person will be compelled to pay any special tax for purposes of a religion other than his own.

Every religious group will be assured of its right to manage its own religious affairs, to establish and maintain institutions for religious or charitable purposes and to acquire and own property and hold and administer it in accordance with the law.

There would be freedom to establish and maintain instituttions for religious education. No person in the Federation of Malaysia will be required, except in accordance with the laws of his own religion, to receive instruction, or take part, in any ceremony or act of worship of any religion.

All these rights which are in fact universally enjoyed at present in the Federation of Malaya will be enshrined in the constitution of the Federation of Malaysia.

14 - Islam in relation to a state within the Federation:

The Comittee examined the position of Islam in relation to a state other than a Malay state and finds no objection to the present arrangement for Penang and Malacca being adopted in the future states of Sarawak and North Borneo and Singapore.

Each of these states will have in its constitution provision for conferring on the Yang di-Pertuan Agong the position of Head of the Muslim religion in the state whose legislature would make laws for regulating Muslim religious affairs and for constituting a Council to advise the Yang di-Pertuan Agong in matters relating to the Muslim religion.

The Committee observes that in practice these three territories are already, to some extent, concerning themselves with the affairs of Muslim religion and the adoption of this principle on a formal basis would present no difficulty.

15 - Fundamental liberties:

The present constitution of the Federation of Malaya has firmly established constitutional guarantees for the people.

The Committee has taken it for granted that these provisions in the Constitution safeguarding the fundamental liberties of the people of the Federation of Malaya would be extended to the people of the Federation of Malaysia whose rights could be enforced by the courts which could countermand and invalidate any attempt to undermine any of those rights whether by legislative or executive action or otherwise.

16 - Elections of representatives to Federal Parliament and State legislatures:

In view of the fact that political advancement in the Borneo Territories is at the moment in varying stages of development, the Committee is convinced that it would not be possible to apply at once on merger the general practice adopted in the Federation of Malaya regarding elections to the Federal Parliament and State Legislatures.

The Committee is of the opinion that, although the pace of these developments should be accelerated, no precipitate step should be taken lest some unforeseen and undesirable consequences might ensue.

The Committee therefore appreciates the suggestion that for the time being in Sarawak the electoral college system may be retained under Malaysia for the State Legislature and the representatives for the Federal Parliament may be elected by the Council Negri from among its members.

In the case of North Borneo, the question of representation to the State Legislature and the Federal Parliament should be a matter for consideration by the Commission of Enquiry.

17 - The Chief Executives:

With regard to the appointment of the chief executive of the state, namely the Chief Ministers in North Borneo and Sarawak respectively, the Committee has not applied its mind on how this should be affected.

Undoubtedly the Chief Minister will be someone who has the support of the State Legislature. It will be his responsiblity to select persons from among the members of the State Legislature to assist and advise him as members of the Executive Council or the Supreme Council, as the case may be.

Brunei is in somewhat a different position and it is envisaged that until a new constitution is introduced and other arrangements made, the Menteri Besar, members of the State Legislature, as well as the Executive Council, will continue to be appointed in accordance with the present arrangements.

18 - Direct elections for future consideration:

It is accepted that these arrangements in the Borneo Territories must necessarily be temporary in nature and should not be allowed to continue indefinitely if these territories are to keep in step with the other states of Malaysia in their political advancement.

As soon as possible, consideration should be given to the desirability of introducing at the proper time the system of direct elections in respect of State and Federal representatives.

19 - Adequate representation in Parliament:

In regard to the question of representation in the Federal Parliament, the Committee is satisfied with the assurance that the Borneo Territories would be given adequate representation and that the universal democratic practice of giving weightage to representation for less densely populated areas would be adopted.

The present arrangement in the Federation of Malaya regarding the appointment and election of members of the Senate should be adopted for the new states of Malaysia.

20 - National Language:

The Committee accepts the view that the Federation of Malaysia should have a national language and places no objection to the adoption of the National Language of the present Federation of Malaya, Singapore and Brunei which is also the lingua franca of this region.

The Committee is aware that in the present Federation of Malaya Constitution it is provided that for ten years from Merdeka Day the English language may be used for official purposes. However, Parliament may also provide that the period be extended.

In any case this period of ten years is applicable to the Federation of Malaya and it is reasonable to expect that this period should only apply to the new states of the Federation of Malaysia with effect from the day Malaysia comes into being.

The Committee is satisfied with the assurance that this period would be extended if so desired and the acceptance of Malay as the national language would in no way prevent the use, teaching or learning of any other language now would it prejudice the right of any state of the Federation of Malaysia to preserve and sustain the use and study of other languages.

21 - Position of English:

English is an international language would maintain its place in Malaysia.

22 - English as medium of instruction:

It has been very much in the minds of the people of Sarawak and North Borneo that the acceptance of Malay as the national language might create problems relating to the policy of making English as the medium of instruction in schools.

There has been uncertainty of the role of English in schools in the Borneo territories. The Committee welcomes and accepts the explanation that the use of English as medium of instruction in schools will in no way conflict with the acceptance of Malay as the national language of Malaysia.

23 - Complete integration desirable:

The Committee has also noted that although the advancement of education is at different stages in different territories its development has been on similar lines whether in the Borneo Territories or in the Federation of Malaya.

As from 1962 free universal primary education is introduced in the Federation of Malaya and the school leaving age is 15. It is therefore hoped that the transitional period which will precede a complete integration of the educational system would be as short as possible so that the Borneo territories would quickly achieve parity in education with the other states in the Peninsula.

24 - Migration:

The Committee dealt very extensively with the question of immigration into the Borneo Territories.

While the concept that the Central Government should be responsible for immigration is acceptable in view of the excellent control and fortunately similar laws that exist today in the Borneo Territories, Singapore and Malaya, it is a matter of great apprehension to the delegations from the Borneo Territories that there might be free movements from Singapore and the Peninsula into the Borneo Teritories.

At the moment these territories are very sparsely populated and therefore may attract settlers from the overcrowded and densely populated areas of Singapore and the peninsula states.

The Borneo Territories are anxious to protect their lands, trade and employment from being taken up by people from other parts of Malaysia. They are also anxious to see that no undesirable elements from other parts of Malaysia are allowed entry into the Borneo Territories, and noted that there are now adequate security arrangements for this purpose.

25 - Safeguards desirable:

The Committee is not oblivious of the fact that if the future states of Borneo desire quick progress and development they will need to attract labour and technical men and these should be obtained at reasonable rates.

However, in fairness to the Borneo Territories the Committee feels that the territory concerned should be given an opportunity to determine the rate and scope of development it may wish to adopt, having taken into account the population problem such development may create and at the same time keeping in step with the general tenor and trend on the general development of the whole Federation of Malaysia in accordance with the national plan.

There are of course certain safeguards which are available to the states in view of their autonomy in matters of land, agriculture and the machinery of state government and control over local governments.

The adoption of certain policies in regard to these matters can have the effect of discouraging or even prevention the migration of people into these states. But the Borneo Territories will not be completely happy unless they are provided with constitutional safeguards.

26 - Control to be devised:

The Committee therefore welcomes the statement from the Prime Minister of the Federation of Malaya that he is extremely sympathetic with the view of the Borneo delegations in this matter.

The Committee is therefore satisfied with the assurance that there would be no unimpeded migration into the Borneo states from the other states of Malaysia and the constitutional provisions whereby such control will be affected can be devised by constitutional experts.

27 - Citizenship:

The Committee dealt with the question of citizenship at some length since this subject is of paramount importance to the peoples concerned.

The position is further complicated in that the people of the Borneo Territories, Singapore and the Federatiom of Malaya are governed by dinstinct and different citizenship and nationality laws.

The Committee has noted that with regard to Singapore there is already an understanding reached with the Government of the Federation of Malaya whereby on merger all Singapore citizens and Federation of Malaysia citizens, would automatically acquire Federation of Malaysia nationality and will, as nationals, have equal rights, carry the same passport, enjoy the same protection and be subject to equal duties and responsibilities under the Constitution of the Federation of Malaysia.

The Committee agrees with the view that there should be a single Malaysian nationality.

28 - Brunei subjects as citizens of Malaysia:

With regard to Brunei the Committee is satisfied with the proposal that a subject of His Highness the Sultan should automatically become a citizen of the Federation of Malaysia.

29 - Position of British subjects permanently resident in Sarawak and North Borneo:

In the case of North Borneo and Sarawak the Committee has accepted the formula that on the date on which the Federation of Malaysia comes into existence, every British subject born in either Sarawak or North Borneo or naturalised before that date will become a citizen of the Federation of Malaysia, provided he is permanently resident on that date 'in the territory in which he was born or naturalised or in one of the other territories of Malaysia.

30 - Person absent:

However, subject to paragraph 33, no person shall become a citizen of the Federation of Malaysia on the appointed day who has been absent from the territories comprising the Federation of Malaysia for a period of seven years upwards immediately prior to the appointed day.

31 - Position of British subjects not permanently resident:

A British subject born before that day in either Sarawak or North Borneo, whose father was himself born in the same territory or was a permanent resident of the territory concerned, will also be entitled to Federal citizenship.

The word "father" referred to means father by blood but not by adoption of a child.

32 - Permanent residence:

A suggestion was made that a person shall be deemed to be "permanently resident" in a territory who has completed a continuous period of 15 years residence in that territory.

This presumption would not of course exclude persons who have not completed the specificed period from establishing permanent residence.

The period, it is felt would be a matter for consideration by the Commission of Enquiry.

33 - Continuity of residence:

In calculating the period of residence periods of absence which are not inconsistent with essential continuity of residence should not be taken into account.

The Committee appreciates that the question of "Permanent residence" is a judicial matter and acknowledges the fact that in practice it is subject to a liberal interpretation which would prevent any miscarriage of justice in cases where a citizen lives abroad but maintains substantial connection with his home in the territory concerned.

34 - Citizenship by registration etc.:

The Committee is generally satisfied with the proposal that the provisions of the present Federal Constitution mutatis mutandis will apply after merger to citizenship by operation of law, registration or naturalisation.

Some transitional arrangements might be desirable in regard to citizenship by registration.

35 - Arrangement for persons born during Brooke and Chartered Company regimes:

The attention of the Committee was drawn to the fact that Sarawak became a colony only on July 1, 1946, while North Borne'o was transferred from the Chartered Company on July 15 in the same year.
Before those dates the people did not have the status of British subjects.

The Comittee therefore accepts the arrangement that a person who would have been a British subject if the territories in which he was born had been a British Colony, in the case of Sarawak from the commencement of the Brooke regime, or, in the case of North Borneo, from the date of the commencement of the Chartered Company regime, will be regarded as a British subject.
This formula would obviate any future difficulties relating to this very important and complex subject.

36 - Position of indigenous peoples:

It is acceptable to the Committee that on the creation of Malaysia the indigenous peoples of the Borneo Territories should be placed in the same position as the Malays under the present constitution of the Federation of Malaya.

They are the "founder citizens" and to place them in a position different from that of Malays from the constitutional point of view would only create anomalies.

The special provision in. the present Federation of Malaya Constitution relating to Malays should be extended to the indigenous peoples of the Borneo territories so that they would equally share whatever advantages might be derived therefrom.

These provisions relate to the reservation of such proportion as may be deemed reasonable of positions in the public service, scholarships and other similar educational or training programmes and special facilities relating to trade or business in order that they may be able to take thier rightful places along with the other communities.

37 - Legitimate inerests of others safeguard:

The Committee is satisfied with the guarantee in the existing constitution of the Federation of Malaya that the rights and legitimate interests of the other communities in the Federation of Malaysia will adequately be safeguard.

38 - State, Federal and concurrent lists applicable:

Having accepted the principle that all the Borneo Territories would join the Federation of Malaysia as states equal in status with the other existing states of the Federation, the Committee is cognizant of the arrangement that the State list, Federal list and Concurrent list of the present Federation of Malaya Constitution defining the present powers and responsibilities of the State and the Federal Governments will, subject to local autonomies and paragraph 41, be applicable in the new Federation of Malaysia.

There may of course be some administrative problems in the case of integration of services and such like matters but the Committee is confident that all those could be resolve by a joint working party of officials.

In this regard the Committee is of the view that nothing should be done so as to disrupt the machinery of government and reduce the efficiency of the services concerned.

39 - Assurance on Civil Service:

With regard to the public services in the Borneo Territories it is agreed that all state civil service appointments would be under the control of the respective State Governments.

In the case of federal services, the Committee welcomes the assurance given by the Prime Minister of the Federation of Malaya on January 6 at the Kuala Lumpur meeting of the Committee when he stated:

"I can also give a categorical assurance that there would be a progressive Borneanisation of the public services in the Borneo Territories and in addition the people of the Borneo Territories would have new opportunities to serve in high appointments in the Federal service. Of course, as I have declared before, nothing should be done to disrupt the present machinery of Government. Expatriate officers who are now serving the various territories would continue to do so until suitable local officers are found to take their places.”

40 - Service in Armed Forces:

The Committee also welcomes the Statement of the Prime Minister in the same speech that the local people of the Borneo Territories should participate in the defence of Malaysia.

"Their young men should be encouraged to enlist in the army, navy or the air force of the Federation of Malaysia and take a legitimate pride in being offiers and other ranks in such forces."

“Programmes will have to be arranged whereby those in schools who aspire to make the armed forces their career will be given suitable training either in our own military college or overseas."

"The warriors of the Borneo Territories should stand shoulder to shoulder with their compatriots in the peninsula in the protection of Malaysia.”

41 - Amendment safeguard:

In the course of its deliberations, the Committee referred to the fears entertained by some delegates that it would be possible for the Federal Government to amend the constitution and withdraw whatever powers it had agreed to give to the states.

The Committee is of the opinion that when an individual, state is given autonomy in respect of a particular matter which is not conceded to all states some from of safeguard will be desirable.

The assurance in this regard was most welcomed. The form such safeguard will take is a matter to be worked out by constitutional experts.

42 - Existing laws to continue until replaced:

With regard to the question of the validity of the exisiting laws in the Borneo Territories until replaced by Federal law, the Committee is satisfied with the explanation that subject to modifications, existing laws on Federal matters would continue until amended or repealed by Parliament.

Existing laws on state matters will continue until amended or replaced by the State legislature.

43 - Economic Aspects of Malaysia:

The Committee made a thorough study of the papers relating to the economic aspects of Malaysia which were tabled by the Federation delegation.

The Committee is adequately assured that the future economic and trade policy of the Federation of Malaysia would not deviate from those precepts which are admirably suited for the purpose of the common prosperity and welfare of the people of Malaysia.

44 - Allocation of development funds and scholarships:

Assurances on the allocation of development funds were most welcome. The Committee endorsed the principle - that the amount should not depend on the size of the state but on priorities, so that the less developed state would get a greater share of such-funds.

In regard to the Federal and Colombo Plan scholarships, candidates would be selected on a fair basis depending on merits.

State scholarships would remain purely a state matter.

Account will be taken in the allocation of Federal, Colombo Plan and other overseas scholarships and training facilities of the need to narrow the gap in educational and technical standards amongst people in various states.

WE, the members of the delegations to the Malaysia Solidarity Consultative Committee from Brunei, Sabah, Sarawak, Singapore and the Federation of Malaya, having completed our deliberations in Singapore this day do hereby attest this Memorandum:

Done at Singapore this third day of February, 1962.

CHAIRMAN: Mr D.A. Stephens;

Brunei Delegation (Observers)
Leader: Dato Setia Pengiran Ali bin Pengiran Haji Mohamed Daud;
Members:
Dato Setia Pengiran Haji Mohamed Yusuf; Haji Jamil bin P.U.K. Awang Haji Umar; Dato Temenggong Lim Cheng Choo; and Dato Abdul Aziz bin Haji Mohamed Zain.

Sabah Delegation:
Leader: O.K.K. Datu Mustapha bin Datu Harun;
Members:
Mr Pang Tet Tshung; O.K.K. G.S. Sundang; and Mr Lai En Kong.

Sarawak Delegation: Leader: Mr Yeo Cheng Hoe;
Members: Mr. Ong Kee Hui,
Temenggong Jugah anak Barieng, Pengarah Montegrai anak Tugang; Dato Abang Haji Openg; Mr Ling Beng Siew; and Mr James Wong.

Federation of Malaya Delegation:
Leader: Inche Mohamed Khir Johari;

Members: Inche Mohamed Ismail bin Mohamed Yusof; Mr V. Manickavasagam; Dr Burhanuddin bin Mohamed Noor; Mr Lee Siok Yew; Tuan Syed Esa bin Alwee; and Inche Abdul Ghani bin Ishak.